Finance          Automotive          Computers          Health          Shopping          Sports         News          Reference           Print Facts in English - BCUZ.COMlos hechos en Español

Open Directory Project



However, the ODP database/editing software is closed source, although Richard Skrenta of ODP did say in June 1998 that he was considering licensing it under the GNU General Public License. This has led to criticism from the aforementioned GNU project and other proponents of free software[citation needed], many of whom also criticise the ODP content license.[22]

As such, there have been some efforts to provide alternatives to ODP. These alternatives would allow communities of like-minded editors to set up and maintain their own open source/open content Web directories. However, no significant open source/open content alternative to ODP has emerged.

[

Hierarchical structure

Recently criticism of ODP's hierarchical structure emerged. Many believe hierarchical directories are too complicated. As the recent emergence of Web 2.0, folksonomies began to appear. These people thought folksonomies, networks, and directed graph are more "natural" and easier to manage than hierarchies.[23][24][25]

[

See also

[

References

  1. ^ "The GnuHoo BooBoo". Slashdot. Retrieved on April 27, 2007.
  2. ^ ODP Front Page, retrieved 15 August 2006
  3. ^ Open Directory Forum - General - Analyzing editor numbers - page 1, 13 August 2006
  4. ^ "Dmoz's Catastrophic Server/Hardware Failure" October 27, 2006, retrieved November 15, 2006
  5. ^ "dmoz.org technical problems (UPDATED: December 18, 2006)", Resource-Zone.com Announcement, retrieved December 19, 2006
  6. ^ dmoz.org technical problems (UPDATED: January 13, 2007) at resource-zone.com
  7. ^ The Hamsters' New Home, in: Open Directory newsletter issue Winter 2006, retrieved December 26, 2006
  8. ^ Danny Sullivan, NewHoo: Yahoo Built By The Masses, Search Engine Watch, July 1, 1998
  9. ^ Kids and Teens Launches! Open Directory Project Newsletter, November/December 2000
  10. ^ Communication and Codes of Conduct: Using the Forums, from the Open Directory Editing Guidelines
  11. ^ Communication and Codes of Conduct: Email and Forum Privacy, from the Open Directory Editing Guidelines
  12. ^ Open Directory Project Administrator Guidelines
  13. ^ Open Directory Meta-editor report
  14. ^ Open Directory Project: Public Abuse Report System.
  15. ^ How to suggest a site to the Open Directory
  16. ^ Open Directory Project Search: "topix" (accessed 18 October 2007)
  17. ^ XODP Yahoo! Group Message Archive
  18. ^ David F. Prenatt, Jr., Life After the Open Directory Project, Traffick.com (June 1, 2000).
  19. ^ CmdrTaco, Dmoz (aka AOL) Changing Guidelines In Sketchy Way, Slashdot (October 24, 2000).
  20. ^ Open Directory Project Meta Guidelines
  21. ^ Arlarson, Editor Removal Explained, Open Directory Project Newsletter (September 2000).
  22. ^ "The primary problems are that your right to redistribute any given version is not permanent and that it requires the user to keep checking back at that site, which is too restrictive of the user's freedom." FSF: Non-Free Documentation Licenses
  23. ^ Hriţcu, C., Folksonomies vs. Ontologies, 8 April 2005.
  24. ^ Shirky, C., Ontology is Overrated: Links, Tags, and Post-hoc Metadata, ITConversations, 15 March 2005.
  25. ^ Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B. & Scott, J., Social Bookmarking Tools (I) D-Lib Magazine, April 2005.

[

External links




BCUZ.com FACTS Encyclopedia content is licensed under the GFDL as approved by Wikipedia.
For more information review our copyright contact and privacy policy.
© 1996 - BCUZ.COM - We have all the FACTS you need about Small Business Financing, Behavior Disorder, Having Too Many Bills, Needing Cash Fast, Structured Settlements, Frequent Flier Programs, Top Steak Houses, The Mayan Indians, Norfolk and Suffolk England, Growing Longer Hair and a full reference English Encyclopedia and Spanish Encyclopedia.Privacy Policy